NOTICE TO INVESTORS: Investors in, Inc. f/k/a Trident Acquisitions Corp. with substantial losses have the opportunity to pursue the class action – LTRY; LTRYW

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of securities of, Inc. f/k/a Trident Acquisitions Corp. (NASDAQ: LTRY; LTRYW) between November 15, 2021 and July 29, 2022 inclusive (the “Class Period”) have until October 18, 2022 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. Subtitle million v., Inc. f/k/a Trident Acquisitions 22-cv-07111 (SDNY), the The class action accuses and some of its top executives of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

If you have suffered substantial losses and wish to act as the lead plaintiff of the class action, please provide your information here:

You can also contact a lawyer JC Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or emailing [email protected]

CASE ALLEGATIONS: is a technology company that operates a business-to-consumer platform that allows players to remotely purchase legally sanctioned lottery games in the United States and around the world. On October 29, 2021, Trident Acquisitions Corp. – a special purpose acquisition vehicle, known as SPAC or Blank Check Company – entered into a business combination with AutoLotto, Inc., which since its inception in 2015 has been doing business as from Following the closing of the business combination, AutoLotto changed its name to

The The class action alleges that the defendants made materially false or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) did not have adequate internal accounting controls; (ii) did not have adequate internal controls over financial reporting, including but not limited to those relating to revenue recognition and cash reporting; and (iii) was not in compliance with state and federal laws governing the sale of lottery tickets.

On July 6, 2022, disclosed that an internal investigation, conducted by independent counsel, had uncovered “instances of non-compliance with state and federal laws regarding the state in which tickets are purchased as well as the execution of orders”. The investigation also revealed “issues with the company’s internal accounting controls.” further disclosed that in light of the findings of the independent investigation, on June 30, 2022, the Board of Directors terminated President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Defendant Ryan Dickinson. At this news,’s share price fell more than 12%.

Then, on July 15, 2022, announced that its defendant, Chief Revenue Officer Matthew Clemenson, had resigned. also revealed that it had “preliminarily concluded[d] that it overstated its unrestricted free cash balance by approximately $30 million and that, relatedly, in the prior year, it incorrectly recorded revenue of the same amount” and that “ in consultation with its external advisors, is currently validating its preliminary conclusion, assessing any impact on previously published financial reports, and has begun to put in place appropriate corrective measures. At this news,’s share price fell another 14.5%.

Subsequently, on July 22, 2022, disclosed that it had been advised by its independent accountant that its audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 and its unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended December 31, March 2022 should no longer be invoked. Additionally, reported that defendant CEO and co-founder Anthony DiMatteo is stepping down, effective immediately. As a result of this news,’s stock price fell approximately 12% over the next two trading days.

Finally, on July 29, 2022, disclosed that it did not have “sufficient financial resources to fund its operations or pay certain existing obligations” and therefore intended to lay off some employees effective July 29. July 2022. Additionally, because’s resources were not sufficient to fund its operations for a 12-month period, it disclosed that “there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue its activities” and may be forced to terminate its operations or continue to liquidate its assets. At this news,’s share price fell about 64%, further hurting investors.

Robbins Geller launched a dedicated SPAC working group to protect investors in blank check companies and seek redress for corporate wrongdoing. Comprised of experienced litigators, investigators and forensic accountants, the SPAC Task Force is dedicated to rooting out and prosecuting fraud on behalf of aggrieved SPAC investors. The rise of blank check funding presents unique risks for investors. Robbins Geller’s SPAC Task Force represents the forefront of ensuring integrity, honesty and fairness in this rapidly developing area of ​​investment.

THE PRINCIPAL APPLICANT PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased or acquired securities during the Class Period to seek appointment as a lead plaintiff. A principal plaintiff is generally the plaintiff with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class that is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members by directing the class action. The main plaintiff can select a law firm of his choice to plead class action. An investor’s ability to participate in any potential future takeover does not depend on its status as the lead claimant of the class action.

ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller is one of the world’s leading complex class action firms representing plaintiffs in securities fraud cases. The firm is ranked No. 1 in the 2021 ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 50 report for recovering nearly $2 billion for investors last year alone, more than triple the amount recovered by any other firm from plaintiffs. With 200 attorneys in 9 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs firms in the world, and the firm’s attorneys have secured many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the most largest ever-recorded securities class action recovery – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Dry. Litigation Please visit the following page for more information:

Lawyer advertisement.

Past results do not guarantee future results.

Services can be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

Comments are closed.